Pradeep v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order only; no substantive decision of general application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 45048 of 2025
Pradeep
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kanhaiya Mishra, Sandeep Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 80
HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.
Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to implead the complainant within a week.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to file the copy of the complaint as well as the summoning order.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pradeep
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Nand Prabha Shukla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/45048/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court