Disposed¶15

Arif and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC11 Nov 2025NA528/43877/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS application 43877 of 2025, Allahabad High Court, Arif v. State of U.P.; compromise dated 26.09.2025 between parties in offence under Sections 307 and 504 IPC (Case Crime No. 10 of 1998; Criminal Case No. 2614 of 2006, P.S. Pakwawa/Pakwara, District Moradabad, ACJM Court No. 1 Moradabad); interim stay of trial proceedings till 16.12.2025; two weeks to file supplementary affidavit with original/certified copy of compromise; judge Sanjay Kumar Pachori; order dated 11 November 2025; interim quashment-related stay pending compromise verification.

What did the court decide?

Interim stay of the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2614 of 2006 against the applicants till the next date of listing (16.12.2025), with two weeks' time granted to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the original/certified copy of the compromise.

Arif and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether the pending criminal proceedings against the applicants (Criminal Case No. 2614 of 2006, arising out of Case Crime No. 10 of 1998, under Sections 307, 504 of I.P.C.) should be stayed in view of the parties' compromise dated 26.09.2025.

¶12

Court's answer

Proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2614 of 2006, pending in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Moradabad, shall remain stayed against the applicants until the next date of listing (fixed as 16.12.2025).

¶15

Ratio / Principle

Learned counsel for the applicants is granted two weeks' time to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the original/certified copy of the compromise.

¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Court No. 75), interim order dated November 11, 2025 by Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J. in Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 43877 of 2025, Arif And 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another. Counsel for both sides submitted that the parties had settled their dispute arising out of the offence punishable under Sections 307, 504 of I.P.C. on the basis of a compromise dated 26.09.2025, already verified pursuant to the order of a Co-ordinate Bench of the Court. The Court granted two weeks to the applicants' counsel to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the original/certified copy of the compromise and ordered that, till the next date of listing (16.12.2025), the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2614 of 2006, arising out of Case Crime No. 10 of 1998, Police Station Pakwara, District Moradabad, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Moradabad, shall remain stayed against the applicants. Interim relief only; final disposal deferred to the next date.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43877 of 2025

Arif And 2 Others

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Araf Khan,	Waseem Akram
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 75

¶10

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶11

Sri Tauseef Khan, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record.

¶12

Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that parties settled their dispute arising out of offence punishable under Sections 307, 504 of I.P.C. on the basis of compromise dated 26.09.2025, which has been verified in pursuance of the order of Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

¶13

Learned counsel for the applicants prays for and is granted two weeks time to file supplementary affidavit annexing the original/ certified copy of the compromise.

¶14

Put up this case as fresh on 16.12.2025.

¶15

Till the next date of listing proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2614 of 2006, arising out of Case Crime No. 10 of 1998, under Sections 307, 504 of I.P.C., Police Station- Pakwara, District Moradabad, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Moradabad shall remain stayed against the applicants.

¶16

November 11, 2025 Ishan

¶17

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Arif and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arif and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pheroz Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Anil Kumar Pal and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Pramod Kumar and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. Home Deptt. Thru. Secy. Lko and Another

Nadeem Khan and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahees vs State of U.P. through secretary home

Kallayya Pattadamath @ Akshay Pattadamath vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.