Applicants sought relief under Section 528 BNSS. In view of the Full Bench decision in Ghulam Rasool Khan, which bars inherent jurisdiction where appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act is available, the application was permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed with liberty to pursue alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43716 of 2025
Rakesh And 6 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gaurav Singh, Pawan Kumar, Vikrant Rana Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 74
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
(Deepak Verma,J.)
November 10, 2025
SKD
Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an aggrieved person with an appeal remedy under Section 14A of the 1989 Act may invoke the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rakesh And 6 Others
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
