Saudan and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The order merely passes the case over for two weeks at the request of counsel. It decides nothing on merits or procedure.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 42207 of 2025
Saudan And 3 Others
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus |
|---|
| State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjani Kumar Raghuvanshi |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. |
| Court No.- 74 |
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
- At the request of counsel for the applicants, the case is passed over for the day.
- List after two weeks, as fresh.
(Deepak Verma,J.)
October 29, 2025
Meenu Singh
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Saudan And 3 Others
- respondent
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/42207/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court