Disposed

Amit Dixit Alias Monu Dixit v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC29 Oct 2025NA528/41755/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant granted bail in four separate cases sought permission to furnish only two common sureties due to poverty. Relying on a Supreme Court order, the court directed that fresh two sureties and a personal bond furnished in one case be treated as sureties and bonds in the other cases.

What did the court decide?

Direction to accept two fresh sureties and personal bond in one case as covering all other bail cases.

Amit Dixit Alias Monu Dixit vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41755 of 2025

¶3

Amit Dixit Alias Monu Dixit

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Rajesh Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 78

¶10

HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶12

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated by the concerned police in four cases. It has further been submitted that in all the cases his bail application has been allowed by this Court / court concerned but due to his poverty and financial crisis he is not able to manage separate sureties in all the cases. It has further been submitted that the applicant may be allowed to be released on bail only on two sureties in regard to all the cases.

¶13

Learned counsel further submitted that the applicant has been enlarged on bail in the following cases:

¶14

(i) Case Crime No.241/2025, under sections 318(4), 303(2), 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station Tajganj, District Agra.

¶15

(ii) Case Crime No.293/2025, under sections 352 / 308(5) B.N.S., Police Station Tajganj, District Agra.

¶16

(iii) Case Crime No.302/2025, under section 3/25 Arms Act, Police Station Tajganj, District Agra.

¶17

(iv) Case Crime No.300/2025, under sections 317(2) / 317(5) B.N.S., Police Station Tajganj, District Agra.

¶18

Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed and submitted that all the offences against the applicant are pending in different courts and hence prayer of the

¶19

NA528 No. 41755 of 2025

¶20

¶21

applicant cannot be allowed.

¶22

Keeping in view the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the factual argument and the judgment and order dated 29.10.2018 of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh passed in Petition (s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8914-8915/2018 , this Court is of the view that ends of justice would be met in case applicant is directed to submit fresh two sureties and a personal bond to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in one case and the same shall be considered by the Court concerned as sureties and bonds in other case(s) for the purpose of releasing the applicant on bail.

¶23

It is ordered accordingly.

¶24

With the aforesaid observations, the instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C. is accordingly disposed of.

¶25

October 29, 2025 ss

¶26

(Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.)

¶27

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amit Dixit Alias Monu Dixit v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Dixit Alias Monu Dixit v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyendra Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Hanif Alias Bhura vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Harviri Kardam vs State of U.P. and Another

Asyant vs State of U.P.

Deepak Alias Gabbar and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Dharmveer Alias Dhurmu vs State of U.P.