Roshan and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicants sought quashing of prosecution for cheating and forgery offences, alleging a false FIR, insufficient evidence, and a compromise between the parties with the disputed amount refunded. Court issued notice to opposite party no. 2, sought counter affidavit from the State, and interim protection against coercive action.
What did the court decide?
Notice to opposite party no. 2; no coercive action against applicants until next date (5.12.2025).
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41617 of 2025
Roshan And 3 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s):Mohammad Belal
Counsel for Opposite Party(s):G.A.
Court No. - 78
HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as
the learned AGA.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings in case crime no. 899 of 2023 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and 66(D) I.T. Act should be quashed given an alleged compromise between the parties?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Roshan And 3 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/41617/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Vivek Kumar Singh
- Order 2 · Vivek Kumar Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court