Rashid and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicants sought relief under Section 528 BNSS after settling a criminal dispute by compromise. The court took a vakalatnama on record for the first informant's counsel, directed verification of the compromise by the trial court within six weeks, listed the case afresh for April 2026, and stayed further proceedings until then.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41194 of 2025
Rashid And 3 Others
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Mukesh Chandra Prakash Gupta |
Gupta, Shubham |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
- Sri Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the first informant/ opposite party no. 2 in court today, is taken on record.
- Office is directed to show the name of Sri Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, as counsel for the opposite party no. 2 by the next date of listing.
- Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that parties settled their dispute arising out of offence punishable under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C. on the basis of compromise dated 30.08.2025. Original compromise is annexed as annexure no.4 to the affidavit.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings in the pending criminal case should be stayed while parties verify their compromise settlement.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rashid and 3 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
First Informant (Opposite Party No. 2)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/41194/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court