Dismissed
Amzad and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCNA528/41152/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
¶2
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41152 of 2025
¶3
Amzad And Another
¶4
.....Applicant(s)
¶5
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
¶6
Court No. - 74
¶7
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
¶8
- The full Bench judgment passed in Ghulam Rasool Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others the Court in para-17 (iii) has held that Question No. (III) is answered in negative holding that the aggrieved person having remedy of appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act, cannot be allowed to invoke inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
¶9
- In view of the aforesaid judgment, the applicants are permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
¶10
- The application is, accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
AMZAD AND OTHER
Coram
AI extract
DEEPAK VERMA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/41152/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court