Tanu Kumar Sengar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application to quash a Family Court order in a Section 145(2) BNSS maintenance-related proceeding whose delay condonation application was allegedly rejected without reasons. The High Court issued notice to opposite party No. 2 and interim protection against coercive measures pending listing.
What did the court decide?
Notice issued; coercive measures stayed against the applicant till next date of listing.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39452 of 2025
Tanu Kumar Sengar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Ashish Goyal |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 80
HON'BLE NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed with the prayer to allow this application and quash the impugned order dated 08.09.2025 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No. 2, Firozabad in Misc. Case No. 1041 of 2024 (Tanu Kumar Sengar Vs. Smt. Renu Jadaon) under Section 145(2) BNSS, Police Station-Shikohabad, District-Firozabad.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tanu Kumar Sengar
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/39452/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court