Jhamman Lal and 9 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicants sought quashing of a criminal case under Sections 420, 447 IPC on the basis of a court-verified compromise between the parties. The court allowed time to file a supplementary affidavit with the certified compromise and stayed further proceedings until the next date.
What did the court decide?
Further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 37 of 2023 stayed until 18.12.2025; two weeks' time granted to file supplementary affidavit with certified verified compromise.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38556 of 2025
Jhamman Lal And 9 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Sudhanshu Singh |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 75
HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.
Sri Vishnu Kumar Patel, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sandeep Agrawal, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for both the parties jointly submitted that the parties settled their dispute with regard to offence punishable under Sections 420, 447, I.P.C. on the basis of compromise, which has been verified by the court below.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jhamman Lal And 9 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/38556/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sanjiv Kumar
- Order 2 · Sanjiv Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court