Disposed¶17

Shankar and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC25 Sept 2025NA528/37647/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS stay application; compromise dated 8.8.2025; Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC; Complaint Case No. 2549 of 2018; Police Station Civil Lines, District Moradabad; Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No. 5 Moradabad; interim stay till 17.12.2025; verification of compromise; supplementary affidavit; Annexure-4; counsel Subodh Pandey; Vakalatnama by Ram Shyam Shankar Pandey for opposite party No. 2.

What did the court decide?

Interim stay of further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2549 of 2018 against the applicants till the next date of listing (fresh listing on 17.12.2025), with directions for verification of the compromise dated 8.8.2025 and filing of a supplementary affidavit by the applicants. ¶17

Shankar and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether, in view of the compromise dated 8.8.2025 settling the parties' dispute under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2549 of 2018 should be stayed against the applicants pending verification of the compromise.

¶12

Court's answer

Both parties are directed to appear before the court concerned within six weeks for verification of the compromise, and the court concerned is directed to verify it.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

Applicants are directed to file a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith the certified copy of the verified compromise as well as the verification proceedings.

¶15

Key takeaways

Interim stay: till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2549 of 2018 (under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Civil Lines, District Moradabad, before Additional Civil Judge JD, Court No. 5, Moradabad) shall remain stayed against the applicants; case to be put up afresh on 17.12.2025.ratio¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 37647 of 2025, Shankar & 4 Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr., decided September 25, 2025: counsel jointly reported a compromise dated 8.8.2025 settling the dispute over the offence punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC (certified copy Annexure-4). Both parties were directed to appear before the court concerned within six weeks for verification, which is to verify the compromise; applicants to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the certified verified compromise and verification proceedings. Further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2549 of 2018 (Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Civil Lines, District Moradabad, pending before Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 5, Moradabad) were stayed against the applicants till the next date of listing, fixed as 17.12.2025.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37647 of 2025

Shankar And 4 Others

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Subodh Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 74

¶10

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶11

Shri Ram Shyam Shankar Pandey, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party No. 2, which is taken on record.

¶12

Learned counsel for both the parties jointly submitted that parties settled their dispute with regard to offence punishable under Sections 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C. on the basis of compromise dated 8.8.2025. Certified copy of the compromise is on record as Annexure-4 to the affidavit.

¶13

Both the parties are directed to appear before the court concerned within six weeks from today for verification.

¶14

Court concerned is directed to verify the same.

¶15

Applicants are directed to file supplementary affidavit annexing therewith certified copy of the verified compromise as well as verification proceedings.

¶16

Put up this case as fresh on 17.12.2025 showing the name of Shri Ram Shyam Shankar Pandey as counsel for the opposite party No. 2.

¶17

Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2549 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Civil Lines, District Moradabad, pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 5, Moradabad shall remain stayed against the applicants.

¶18

September 25, 2025 T. Sinha

¶19

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shankar and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankar and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Uma Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd Ibadullah vs State of Up and 6 Others

Smt Gulshan and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Dulichandra Tiwari vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Sanjna and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt Nishtha Srivastava and 6 Others vs State of U.P. and Another