Tasleem v. State of U.P. and Another
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36026 of 2025
Tasleem
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
| .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Safal Pandey |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
| Court No.- 73 |
HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
- Shri Rakesh Kumar Maurya, learned Advocate has filed memo of appearance on behalf of respondent no.2, which is taken on record.
- Office is directed to print the name of Shri Rakesh Kumar Maurya as counsel for respondent no.2
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings may be quashed under Section 528 BNSS based on a compromise between the parties.
Whether the matter requires verification of the compromise by the court below before quashing the proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tasleem
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
DINESH PATHAK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/36026/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court