Disposed¶18

Gopal Alias Gopal Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC8 Oct 2025NA528/34495/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS application; compromise verification; interim stay of criminal proceedings; Sections 115, 352, 351(2) B.N.S.; Criminal Case No. 1729 of 2025; Case Crime No. 492 of 2024; Police Station Baheri, District Bareilly; Judicial Magistrate, Baheri; compromise dated 26.8.2025; connected with Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 34219 of 2025; listed 17.12.2025; Gopal alias Gopal Singh v. State of U.P.; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.

What did the court decide?

Interim stay: till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1729 of 2025 shall remain stayed against the applicants; matter listed fresh on 17.12.2025. ¶18

Gopal Alias Gopal Singh and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Interim stay: till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1729 of 2025 shall remain stayed against the applicants; matter listed fresh on 17.12.2025.

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1729 of 2025 (arising out of Case Crime No. 492 of 2024, under Sections 115, 352, 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Baheri, District Bareilly) should remain stayed against the applicants pending verification of the compromise dated 26.8.2025.

¶18

Court's answer

Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1729 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 492 of 2024, under Sections 115, 352, 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Baheri, District Bareilly, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Baheri, Bareilly, shall remain stayed against the applicants.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

The Office was directed to send the original compromise to the court concerned for verification immediately after retaining a photocopy of the same; both parties were directed to appear before the court concerned within six weeks for verification; and the court concerned was directed to verify the compromise.

¶9

Key takeaways

The applicants were directed to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the certified copy of the verified compromise as well as the verification proceedings.ratio¶12
The matter was ordered to be connected with Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 34219 of 2025 and to be put up as fresh on 17.12.2025, showing the name of Shri Devendra Kumar Tiwari as counsel for opposite party No. 2.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.), interim order dated October 8, 2025 in Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 34495 of 2025 (Gopal alias Gopal Singh and 3 others v. State of U.P. and another): learned counsel for both parties reported that the parties had settled their dispute relating to the offence punishable under Sections 115, 352, 351(2) B.N.S. by compromise dated 26.8.2025, the original being on record as Annexure-6. The Office was directed to send the original compromise to the court concerned for verification after retaining a photocopy; both parties to appear before the court concerned within six weeks; the court concerned to verify the compromise; and the applicants to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the certified copy of the verified compromise and the verification proceedings. The matter was connected with Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 34219 of 2025 and listed fresh on 17.12.2025, showing Shri Devendra Kumar Tiwari as counsel for opposite party No. 2. Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1729 of 2025 (arising out of Case Crime No. 492 of 2024, P.S. Baheri, District Bareilly) were stayed against the applicants.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34495 of 2025

¶2

Gopal Alias Gopal Singh And 3 Others

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

Versus
State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 75

¶6

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶7

Sri Devendra Kumar Tiwari, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record.

¶8

Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that parties settled their dispute with regard to offence punishable under Sections 115, 352, 351(2) of B.N.S. on the basis of compromise dated 26.8.2025. Original compromise is on record as Annexure-6 to the affidavit.

¶9

Office is directed to send original compromise to the court concerned for verification immediately after retaining a photocopy of the same.

¶10

Both the parties are directed to appear before the court concerned within six weeks from today for verification.

¶11

Court concerned is directed to verify the same.

¶12

Applicants are directed to file supplementary affidavit annexing certified copy of the verified compromise as well as verification proceedings.

¶13

Connect with Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 34219 of 2025.

¶14

Put up this case as fresh on 17.12.2025 showing the name of Shri

¶15

NA528 No. 34495 of 2025

¶16

¶17

Devendra Kumar Tiwari as counsel for the opposite party No. 2.

¶18

Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1729 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 492 of 2024, under Sections 115, 352, 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Baheri, District Bareilly, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Baheri, Bareilly shall remain stayed against the applicants.

¶19

October 8, 2025 T. Sinha

¶20

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶21

Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Gopal Alias Gopal Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Alias Gopal Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Kumar Yadav and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Krishan Kumar Sharma Alias Banty and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Nazir Ahmad vs State of U.P. and Another

Bhagwan Swaroop and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Juvenile X and Another vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Raju and Another vs State of U.P. and Another