Applicants sought quashing of a non-bailable warrant issued in a 2003 case under IPC provisions and wire theft law. The court found no convincing grounds for quashing but directed applicants to appear before the trial court within three weeks and restrained coercive action till then.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33793 of 2025
Hari Shankar Prasad And 2 Others
| Versus | .....Applicant(s) | |
|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : | Akash Kumar Sharma |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : | G.A. |
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
NA528 No. 33793 of 2025
2
impugned.
(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)
September 4, 2025
Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the non-bailable warrant order dated 20.12.2003 should be quashed on the ground that applicants lacked knowledge of the proceedings.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Hari Shankar Prasad
State of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
