Dismissed

Smt Pooja v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Nov 2025NA528/32562/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application to quash charge-sheet and cognizance order in a case under Sections 420 and 465 IPC dismissed on merits. Court found no illegality in the proceedings or the order taking cognizance, holding that matters raised are for trial.

What the court decided

AI extract

Smt Pooja vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 32562 of 2025

¶3

Smt Pooja

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Haya Rizvi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 77

¶7

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State perused the record.

¶9

This application has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceeding as well as Charge Sheet dated 21.05.2024 alongwith cognizance/summoning order dated 30.08.2024, in Case No.16720 of 2024 (State vs. Pooja) arising out of Case crime no.94 of 2024 under Sections 420, 465 IPC, Police Station Chhapar, District Muzaffar Nagar pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, Muzaffar Nagar.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the proceeding initiated against the applicant is illegal and against the material available on record; the material of investigation does not disclose commission of any alleged offences against the applicant and as such the proceedings initiated against the applicant including the impugned charge-sheet and cognizance/summoning order are liable to be quashed by this court.

¶11

Per contra, learned AGA for the State vehemently opposed the prayer as made in the application and rebutted the stand taken up by learned counsel for applicant by way of submitting that the averments whatsoever has been raised by learned counsel for applicant is subject matter of trial and submitted that after considering the material available on record, charge-sheet has been submitted against the applicant upon which learned court concerned has rightly taken cognizance and summoned the applicant.

¶12

After hearing rival submissions extended by learned counsel for the parties and by bare perusal of record, there appears to be no illegality and impropriety in the impugned charge-sheet and cognizance/summoning order and as such learned court concerned has rightly proceeded against the applicant.

¶13

In view thereof, the instant application under Section 528 BNSS lacks merit and is hereby dismissed .

¶14

NA528 No. 32562 of 2025

¶15

¶16

However, it is made clear that this order shall not preclude the applicant from availing the remedies which are available to her as per law.

¶17

November 17, 2025

¶18

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

¶19

Rakesh

¶20

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt Pooja v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Smt Pooja v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jubair and 6 Others vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shakeel and Another vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Dr Gama Alias Shakhavat vs State of U.P. and Another

Vinod Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Balwant Yadav and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Vikash Sharma Alias Vishal Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another