Jitesh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order only. The court adjourned an application under Section 528 BNSS on counsel's request, noting a chance of compromise between the parties; it decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 25767 of 2025
Jitesh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Sunil Kumar Dubey |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 77
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
- At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant submitted that there is ample chance of compromise between the parties and as such, matter may be passed over for a considerable period of time.
- On the request of learned counsel for applicant, put up this case on 08.12.2025 as fresh .
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jitesh
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/25767/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court