Rakesh Kumar and 13 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC7 Jul 2025NA528/19998/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.528 BNSS application; Rakesh Kumar and 13 others v. State of U.P. and another; compromise dated 08.04.2025 pending verification before ACJM Kannauj; direction to verify compromise within four weeks and report; Registrar (Compliance) to serve order within 24 hours; interim stay of coercive action against applicants till next date; listed week commencing 04.08.2025; single judge (Saurabh Srivastava, J.); order dated 7.7.2025; no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection to applicants (no coercive action till next date of listing); Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj directed to verify the compromise dated 08.04.2025 within four weeks and report; Registrar (Compliance) to ensure service of the order within 24 hours; matter to be listed in the week commencing 04.08.2025. ¶¶10

Rakesh Kumar and 13 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶10

Issue for consideration

Whether the compromise dated 08.04.2025 between the parties should be verified by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj, and whether coercive action against the applicants should be withheld in the interim pending such verification and further adjudication.

¶¶6

Court's answer

The learned court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj is directed to verify the compromise dated 08.04.2025 within four weeks, in presence of both parties, and to report the same so that the matter may be adjudicated on the basis of the verification report.

¶¶7

Ratio / Principle

Registrar (Compliance), Allahabad High Court is directed to ensure service of the order upon the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj within 24 hours, and after seeking the verification report the same may be placed on record.

¶¶8

Key takeaways

As interim protection, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicants till the next date of listing; the Court noted this was not disputed by counsel for the informant.ratio¶¶10

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Saurabh Srivastava, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 19998 of 2025, order dated 7.7.2025: Both sides jointly submitted that the parties had entered into a compromise dated 08.04.2025, already filed before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj and pending verification there. The Court directed the ACJM, Kannauj to verify the compromise within four weeks in the presence of both parties and submit a report for adjudication on its basis; directed the Registrar (Compliance) to ensure service of the order upon the ACJM within 24 hours and place the verification report on record; and, as interim protection not disputed by the informant's counsel, directed that no coercive action be initiated against the applicants till the next date of listing. Matter listed in the week commencing 04.08.2025.

Rakesh Kumar and 13 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar and 13 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raman Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd Umar @ Umarua vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Smt. Kamlesh and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Balendra Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nafis and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Santosh Kumar Maurya vs State of Up and Another