Mohanlal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order granting three days time to the appellant to file an application for impleadment of necessary parties raised by the AGA in a jail appeal regarding conviction under the POCSO Act.
What the court decided
Court No. - 12
Case :- JAIL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 61 of 2025
Appellant :- Mohanlal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Appellant :- Manish Vaish Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
On an objection raised by learned AGA that necessary parties have not been impleaded whereas conviction is under the POCSO Act also, Sri Manish Vaish, learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted three days time to move application for impleadment.
As prayed, list on 28.07.2025 as fresh.
Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Akanksha Sri/-
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohanlal
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- JAPLD/61/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mohd. Kadir vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Ram Chandra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 2 Others
Suraj Kanaujia vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Shailesh Kumar Dwivedi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others