Sudesh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others
Allahabad HCJAPLD/48/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A jail appeal was listed before a two-judge bench; the court heard counsel, issued notice to respondent no. 2 with directions to complete steps within a week and to list the matter after service.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 9
¶2
Case :- JAIL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 48 of 2025
¶3
Appellant :- Sudesh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Niteesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
¶5
Order on C.M. Application No. 01 of 2025
¶6
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State- respondents.
¶7
- Issue notice to respondent no. 2.
¶8
- Steps be taken within a week.
¶9
- Office to proceed accordingly.
¶10
- List immediately after service of notice.
¶11
(R.M.N. Mishra, J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sudesh
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko
Coram
AI extract
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- JAPLD/48/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Alok Verma and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Others
Abhishek Kumar Singh and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home and Confidential Lko. and Others
Kaushal Kishor Awasthi vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others
Chhote Lal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 4 Others