Suneeta v. Sriram
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal filed with delay; no one appeared for the appellant to press the condonation of delay application. The delay condonation application was dismissed for non-prosecution and, consequently, the appeal was also dismissed.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2539
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 897 of 2011
Appellant :- Suneeta Respondent :- Sriram Counsel for Appellant :- J.B. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Tarun Kumar Misra
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
( C.M.A. No. 94592 of 2011 )
List has been revised.
No one is present for the appellant to press this application for condonation of delay in filing the present appeal, whereas the learned counsel for the respondent Sri Tarun Kumar Mishra, Advocate, is present.
The Application for condonation of delay is dismissed for nonprosecution. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed .
( Rajnish Kumar, J. )
Order Date :- 15.1.2025 A.Nigam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Suneeta
- respondent
Sriram
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAFOD/897/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Gyanesh Kumar Dikshit vs M. Devaraj, Principal Secretary to Govt. of U.P., (Acting As Addl. Chief Secy., State Tax, Lucknow)
Kapil Deo Singh vs Sunil Chaudhary, Prin. Chief Conservator of Forest and Head of Department Lko. and 3 Others
Pankaj Kumar Yadav vs Dr. Chandra Bhushan, M.D., U.P. Co-Operative Federation Ltd., Lko.
Sri Prashuram Misra and Anr. Vs Union of India Thru. Ggeneral Manager North Eastern