First appeal from order concerning insurance claim; notice on respondent no.1 held sufficient but service on respondent nos.2 and 3 failed due to closed transport firm and incorrect address. Court listed the matter after two weeks for counsel to provide or amend correct addresses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 166 of 2024
Appellant :- Smt. Chhaya Singh And Others Respondent :- United India Insurance Company Limited, Bahraich Thru. Branch Manager And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Mukesh Singh,Faizal Hashmi,Haroon Rasheed
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
As per office report, the service of notice on the respondent no.1 is sufficient.
The service of notice on the respondent nos.2 and 3 is not sufficient.
The notice on the respondent no.2 could not be served as Faizabad Lucknow Transport has been closed many years ago and on respondent no.3 could not be served on account of incorrect address.
As payed by Shri Faizal Hashmi, learned counsel for the appellants, list after two weeks to enable him to provide/ amend the present correct address of the respondent nos.2 and 3.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.)
Order Date :- 10.2.2025 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Chhaya Singh And Others
United India Insurance Company Limited, Bahraich Thru. Branch Manager
Respondent No. 2 (Faizabad Lucknow Transport)
Respondent No. 3
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
