The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the benefiting advocate failed to trace the paper book and could not explain his non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 508 of 2019
Appellant :- Smt. Bhanumati And Ors. Respondent :- Rakesh Singh And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Ali Jibran,Sheeran Mohiuddin Alavi Counsel for Respondent :- Mahesh Kumar Singh,Manish Kumar Ii
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Nitin Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ali Jibran, learned counsel for the appellants prays for adjournment on the ground that his paper book is not traceable, whereas the case was got adjourned by Shri Mohiuddin Alavi, learned counsel for the appellants on the previous date and there is no request on his behalf for adjournment or pass over. The counsel, who is appearing, also could not give any explanation for his non appearance. The appeal is of the year 2019.
The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 21.2.2025 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Bhanumati And Ors.
Rakesh Singh And Ors.
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
