First appeal dismissed for non-prosecution: appellants failed to take necessary steps despite prior order granting ten days' further time; appeal dismissed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the High Court Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 386 of 2017
Prabhawati And 5 Others
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
Ifcotokiyo General Insurance Company Ltd. New Delhi And Anr.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajendra Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Govind Chaturvedi, Vaibhav Raj
Court No. - 19
HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
"1. The matter is listed today under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant is allowed ten days further time to take necessary steps in terms of the earlier order. If so, office to proceed and list thereafter.
3. In case, if the steps are not taken within the aforesaid period, the matter shall be listed immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period of ten days under the appropriate head. "
(Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.)
November 11, 2025
Mohd. Sharif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prabhawati And 5 Others
Ifcotokiyo General Insurance Company Ltd. New Delhi
Anr.
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
