Dismissal of first appeal for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellant even in revised call; interim order, if any, vacated; Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; FAO No. 239 of 2016; Nirmala Devi v. Ram Chandra; Prashant Kumar, J.; order dated December 3, 2025.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 239 of 2016
Nirmala Devi
.....Appellant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| Ram Chandra And Ors. | .....Respondent(s) |
| Counsel for Appellant(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) |
: Saggir, Sanjay Singh Chauhan : |
Court No. - 19
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears on behalf of the appellant even in the revised call.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
December 3, 2025
Arjun/-
(Prashant Kumar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
