Mohd. Saleem Khan and 2 Others v. Sri Ved Prakash Malviya and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
FAO No. 228 of 2017, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow), Court No. 19; Justice Prashant Kumar; decided December 17, 2025. Dismissed for want of prosecution due to complete non-appearance of appellants and absence of any adjournment/pass-over request. Appellants Mohd. Saleem Khan & 2 Others (counsel Sandeep Kumar Tahlani); respondents Sri Ved Prakash Malviya & 2 Others (counsel Prasoon Kumar Rai, present for respondent no. 3). No issues adjudicated, no statutes cited, no precedents cited; procedural record only.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the appellants to press the appeal and there was no request to adjourn or pass over the case; only counsel for respondent no. 3 was present. ¶10