Suresh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Nil. A single-line order listing a criminal revision in the top twenty cases for future hearing, noting service of notice and absence of opposite parties.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 937 of 2024
Revisionist :- Suresh Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ved Prakash Pandey,Vikas Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Madan Pal Singh,J.
- Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the revisionist is taken on record.
- Office report dated 08.07.2024 reflects that the notice on opposite parties no. 2 and 3 have been served personally but none has put in appearance on their behalf.
- On the request of learned counsel for the revisionist, list on 22.08.2025 as fresh in top twenty cases.
- It is made clear that on the next date of listing, in case, none appeared on behalf of the opposite parties no.2 and 3, the Court will be constrained to hear and decide the case on the assistance of learned AGA.
Order Date :- 13.8.2025 Prajapati RK
(Madan Pal Singh, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suresh Kumar Yadav
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/937/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court