Disposed

Satyanarayan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC6 Aug 2025CRLR/849/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

During hearing of a criminal revision challenging a magistrate's order under sections 498-A, 323, and 506 IPC, the court granted the prosecution two weeks to file a written response and stayed the proceedings pending the next date of listing.

What did the court decide?

Granted two weeks to the opposite party to file response; proceedings stayed until 25.08.2025.

Satyanarayan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 849 of 2025 Revisionist :- Satyanarayan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Shankar Lal Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vinod Mishra

¶2

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶3

Sri Vinod Mishra, learned Advocate, has put in appearance for opposite party no.2 and has filed his Vakalatnama,which is taken on record.

¶4

Heard Sri Shankar Lal Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Vinod Mishra, learned Counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record.

¶5

The present application has been filed by the revisionist for the following main relief(s):-

¶6

"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to set aside the impugned order dated 25.06.2025 passed by Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 18, Barabanki in Criminal Case No. 26851 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No. / First Information Report No. 632 of 2023 Under Section 498-A, 323, 506, I.P.C. and 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Fatehpur, District Barabanki, in the interest of justice."

¶7

Taking note of the allegations leveled in the FIR against the revisionist as also the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Geeta Mehrotra and others vs. State of U.P. and others, reported in (2012) 10 SCC 741 , Kahkashan Kausar v. State of Bihar, reported in (2022) 6 SCC 599, Achin Gupta vs. State of Haryana and another, reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 759 , Payal Sharma Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3473, Safiya Bano Alias Shakira and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 222 and Mamidi Anil Kumar Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and another, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 127, this Court is of the view that the matter requires consideration.

¶8

Learned Counsel for the opposite party no.2 prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file response to the present revision.

¶9

List this case on 25.08.2025 as fresh , showing the name of Sri Vinod Mishra, learned Advocate as counsel for the side opposite.

¶10

Till the next date of listing, the proceedings, in issue, shall remain stayed qua the revisionist.

¶11

Order Date :- 6.8.2025

¶12

Jyoti/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Satyanarayan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyanarayan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Juvenile X Thru. His Mother vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Ansar Ahamad vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Bholanath Yadav and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Ganesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko

Man Singh and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Deptt. Lko

Mohd. Faruk Alias Chunne vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others