Ajay Pal v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision listed for hearing; counsel submitted that no counter affidavit was filed and the parties may have compromised in the matrimonial matter. The court adjourned the case to a later date without deciding anything.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 407 of 2024
Revisionist :- Ajay Pal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ganesh Shanker Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shahroze Khan
Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J.
- List revised.
- Sri Deepak Kumar Srivastave, Advocate holding brief and appeared for revisionist.
- Learned AGA for the State is present.
- It has been submitted by Sri Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist that counter affidavit has not been filed by the opposite party no.2 till date.
- It has further been submitted by Sri Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist that the parties might have entered into compromise in the matrimonial matter.
- List on 16th July, 2025 .
Parties & counsel
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Avnish Saxena
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/407/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court