The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, in a criminal revision, dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the learned counsel who sought liberty to file a fresh application with proper evidence.
Instant revision dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1357 of 2025
Mo. Shahid
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 5 Others
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) | : Abul Fazal Jaffrey, Syed Muzammil Hasan |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard.
November 24, 2025 Arun/-
(Saurabh Lavania,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
XYZ vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and othersReferred¶12
XYZ vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others, (2023) 9 SCC 705 · Who else cites this
Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi ChaudhuriReferred¶12
Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 569 · Who else cites this
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
