A summons-stage notice order with no substantive finding of record; the Court prima facie observed that the Section 173(4) BNSS, 2023 application did not disclose any cognizable offence and directed notice and a magistrate's report, listing the revision afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1216 of 2025
Anuj Kumar
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anamika Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 27
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
CRLR No. 1216 of 2025
2
Party No.2 is available at page no. 21 and 22 of this criminal revision but the contents of the said application do not disclose any cognizable offence.
9. List this matter on 24.11.2025, as fresh.
October 29, 2025 Renu/-
(Manjive Shukla,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application filed under Section 173(4) BNSS discloses a cognizable offence justifying the CJM's directive to register an FIR?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anuj Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko
Opposite Party No.2
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
