Mohan Lal Agarwal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision listed for hearing; no one appeared for the parties. Opposite parties granted two weeks to file counter affidavit, rejoinder within a week thereafter, and the matter was listed for further hearing.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1001 of 2024
Mohan Lal Agarwal
.....Revisionist(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 3 Others | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) | : G.S. Chauhan, Ram Bahadur |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : Ashok Kumar Tiwari, G.A. |
Court No. - 93
HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.
- Notice on opp. party nos. 2,3,4 has been served and vakalatnama has also been filed on their behalf.
- No one is present on behalf of the parties even on revised call.
- Two weeks time is granted to opp. parties to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
- List on 06.11.2025.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohan Lal Agarwal
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Harvir Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1001/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Rajeev Misra
- Order 2 · Rajeev Misra
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court