Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared for the petitioners even on revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8063 of 2024
Brijesh Kumar And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Vijay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Anil Kumar Yadav, Rakesh Kumar, Surendra Singh
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition even in the revised call.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
November 20, 2025
Haseen U.
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Brijesh Kumar
State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko
Rajiv Gupta
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
