Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioners were absent and the F.I.R. was not challenged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1498-DB
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7821 of 2024
Petitioner :- Miss. Uzma Arif And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankush Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Aishwarya Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
None appears for the petitioners to press the writ petition.
Learned A.G.A. is present in the Court.
Learned A.G.A. on instructions states that there is an F.I.R. lodged against the petitioners bearing Case Crime No.0222 of 2024, under Section 87 of B.N.S.,2023 at Police Station Bazarkhala, District Lucknow.
Since the F.I.R. is not under challenge in the present writ petition and no one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
(Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 8.1.2025 Arjun/-
Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Miss. Uzma Arif And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
