Petition to quash FIR under BNS sections alleging fraud against elderly informant regarding donated property. Court found cognizable offence clearly made out, informant complained within 20 days of alleged fraud, and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:11542-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1417 of 2025
Petitioner :- Satya Nand Upadhyay And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Kesharwani,Mohammad Waseem,Umakant Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
6. The present petition is accordingly dismissed .
Order Date :- 23.1.2025/Madhurima
Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Article 226 jurisdiction should be exercised to quash an FIR alleging fraud in obtaining property by gift deed where a cognizable offence is disclosed.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Satya Nand Upadhyay And 3 Others
State Of U.P.
And 3 Others (Respondents)
Vivek Kumar Birla
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
