Anshika and Another v. State of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court listed the petition for hearing after noting no urgency and absence of counsel for the petitioners.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12328 of 2025
Anshika And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Singh, Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, Arvind Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
An urgency was made out by the learned counsel for the petitioners in the morning for taking up the case today.
Case called out.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anshika And Another
- respondent
State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/12328/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Abdul Moin Babita Rani
- Order 2 · Abdul Moin Babita Rani
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Smt. Roopa Devi (Maiden Name Km. Roopa Devi) and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. (Home) U.P. Lko and 4 Others
Pratap Narayan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others
Mohd. Said @ Bauva and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others
Gaurav Lamination Private Ltd.Thru. Director Gurmeet Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Ministry of Home Affairs Lko. and Others