Writ petition pending since 2021 dismissed for non-prosecution; neither petitioner nor counsel appeared despite the case being called out, and the court held the parties had lost interest in pursuing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1008 of 2021
Mohit Ahlawat
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Ors.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.B.S. Rathaur Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Illegible, Mukesh Kumar Tewari
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
December 2, 2025 ML/-
(Saurabh Lavania,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohit Ahlawat
State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
