Appeal dismissing the argument that an appellant's affidavit misled a coordinate bench into granting bail to another person, holding that bail cannot be cancelled on such frivolous grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 835 of 2024
Sangita
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Appellant(s) | : Ashutosh Gupta, Vandana Gupta |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 87
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
CRLA No. 835 of 2024
2
appellant. As the appellant has violated the condition of the bail order, the bail granted in favour of the appellant vide order dated 25.9.2023 is liable to be cancelled.
6 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the order dated 25.9.2023 passed in Criminal 8386 of 2023. This Court has barely mentioned the affidavit filed by the appellant, but has not considered it to grant bail. Therefore, the argument raised by the appellant has no nexus to the bail order accorded in favour of the respondent no. 2. Hence, there is no ground to cancel the bail granted to the respondent no. 2. Apart from it, it will be pertinent to mention that the affidavit claimed was filed by the appellant herself, and it has no relation to the respondent no. 2. Moreover, grounds for cancellation of bail are entirely different, and bail once granted cannot be cancelled casually on frivolous grounds.
October 29, 2025 Ujjawal
(Anil Kumar-X,J.)
Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sangita
State of U.P.
Anil Kumar-X
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
