Disposed
Amarjeet and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nyay Lucknow and Another
Allahabad HCCRLA/3981/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Time granted to implead injured witness; notice issued to opposite party No.2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3981 of 2025
Amarjeet And Another
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nyay Lucknow And Another
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Sushil Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 28
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Heard.
Admit.
Learned A.G.A. has pointed out that the appellants has not made party to the injured witness, which is necessary for proper adjudication.
Learned Counsel for the appellants has submitted that he may be permitted to move appropriate application to implead the injured witness as one of the opposite parties.
On the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, a week's time is granted to move an appropriate application for impleading the injured witness as one of the opposite parties.
Let notice be issued to opposite party No.2.
Steps be taken.
In the meantime, objection/counter affidavit may be filed by the opposite party No.2 and learned A.G.A..
List after four weeks as fresh.
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.)
December 9, 2025
CRLA No. 3981 of 2025
2
Arvind
Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Amarjeet
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nyay Lucknow
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court