Dinesh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative listing order (not a substantive ruling): Dinesh Kumar (appellant, counsel Santosh Kumar Tripathi) v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others (respondents, counsel G.A.), CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3645 of 2024, Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 12, before Alok Mathur, J.; order date 2.4.2025. Matter not taken up owing to paucity of time; relisted after six weeks; earlier interim orders, if any, continue till next listing. No issues framed, no holdings, no statutory provisions or case law cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
No substantive adjudication: matter could not be taken up due to paucity of time; case listed after six weeks; interim orders, if any, previously granted to continue till the next date of listing. ¶7