No substantive reasoning or decision is provided in this text. The judgment is a procedural order listing steps for notice issuance and filing of counter affidavits.
No substantive proposition is stated. The order directs notice to respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and sets timelines for filing counter affidavits before listing the criminal appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 353 of 2025
Appellant :- Smt. Chandawati Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vyas Narayan Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
[Om Prakash Shukla, J.]
Order Date :- 29.1.2025 -Piyush-
Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Chandawati
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
