Allowed

Lalla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allahabad HC6 Aug 2025CRLA/2336/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Appeal No. 2336 of 2024, the Allahabad High Court granted bail to the appellant, Lalla, convicted under multiple IPC sections. The court relied on the absence of medical evidence, lack of credible injury, and the appellant's clean criminal record.

What did the court decide?

Appellant released on bail on executing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the concerned court.

Lalla vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Court No. - 28

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2336 of 2024

¶3

Appellant :- Lalla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Appellant :- Ashish Kumar Singh,Dileep Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.

¶5

( Criminal Misc. Application No. 1 of 2024) )

¶6

Heard Sri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant as well as the learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The appellant/ applicant, Lalla, seeks bail in this appeal, which has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 04.07.2024 passed by the Court of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 4/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Gonda, in Sessions Trial No. 04 of 2016, arising out of Case Crime No. 659 of 2015, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda, convicting and sentencing the appellant under Sections 307/149,147, 148, 504, 505, 506, 332/149, 353/149, 296, 188, I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act.

¶8

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant that it is a case of no injury, which is evident after looking into statement of the investigating officer, who has admitted that no statement of the doctor was recorded by him. He has also submitted that trial court has not examined any doctor, but the appellant has been convicted under section 307 IPC for 10 years. He has further submitted that no one has seen the appellant on the spot when the altercation took place. He has submitted that the appellant is in jail since 29/5/2024, and he was also in jail for about six months during the trial.

¶9

Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the appellant have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the appellant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required.

¶10

Counsel has attempted to point out several other inherent

¶11

infirmities in the evidence and also the elements of improbability contained therein and it has been argued that with such infirmities on record there is a reasonable prospect of this appeal being allowed after final hearing takes place.

¶12

Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the bail, but he could not dispute the fact that no doctor was examined or that any injury was received by any one.

¶13

Considering the overall argument that no doctor was examined or that any injury was received by any one; applicant has no criminal history and he is in jail since 04.07.2024; the unlikelihood of early hearing and conclusion of appeal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case for bail. The bailapplication is accordingly allowed .

¶14

Let the appellant/ applicant, Lalla, convicted and sentenced in Sessions Trial No. 04 of 2016, arising out of Case Crime No. 659 of 2015, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda, under Sections 307/149,147, 148, 504, 505, 506, 332/149, 353/149, 296, 188, I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶15

On acceptance of bail bond and personal bond, the lower court concerned shall transmit the photostat copies thereof to this Court for being kept on the record.

¶16

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad or certified copy issued from the Registry of the High Court, Allahabad.

¶17

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶18

( Brij Raj Singh, J. )

¶19

Order Date :- 6.8.2025 A.Nigam

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Lalla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalla v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Teerath Alias Kulbul vs District Deputy Director of Consolidation Collector District Basti AND12 Others

Smt. Shalu Yadav and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another

Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Singh and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. of U.P. Lko. and Another

Ibrahim vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Ramsuchit Yadav vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nidhi Singh vs State of U.P. and 4 Others