Pradeep Kumar Sharma and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This order is a listing order in Criminal Appeal No. 1878 of 2024. The court noted the absence of the appellants despite the presence of counsels, recorded existing counsel's appearance for the respondent, and adjourned the matter to a future date for records and appearance.
What the court decided
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1878 of 2024
Appellant :- Pradeep Kumar Sharma And 2 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Mukesh Kumar Pandey,Punit Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Vinod Kumar Upadhyay,Vivek Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J .
1. List revised.
- No one appears on behalf of the appellants to press this appeal despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing for the appellants.
- Sri Vivek Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Sri Virendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State are present and records have been perused.
- Vakalatnama of Sri Vivek Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 is not on record, despite his name being printed in the cause list.
- Office to trace-out the Vakalatnama and place on record by the next date.
- Since there is no representation on behalf of appellants, in the interest of justice, as a last opportunity, the matter is adjourned for today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pradeep Kumar Sharma And 2 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1878/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Nand Prabha Shukla
- Order 2 — this page · Nand Prabha Shukla
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court