Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence. The court partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the order passed in Capital Cases No. 4 of 2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1626 of 2021
Prem Chand @ Pappu Dixit
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And Anr.
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
The appeal is partly allowed vide our order of date passed on separate sheets contained in Capital Cases No. 4 of 2021 : State of U.P. Versus Premchandra @ Pappu Dixit.
(Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)
November 18, 2025
Ajit
Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Prem Chand @ Pappu Dixit
State Of U.P.
Anr.
Rajnish Kumar
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
