Criminal appeal against a summoning order under BNSS and SC/ST Act provisions. The prayer to quash was refused, but the appellants were granted liberty to appear before the trial court within two weeks and apply for bail, which is to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:30515
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1553 of 2025
Appellant :- Prahalad Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Jitendra Prakash Mishra,Ram Lal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
Order Date :- 22.5.2025 A. Verma
(Alok Mathur, J.)
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to the appellants to seek bail in view of Satender Kumar Antil despite refusal to quash the summoning order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Prahalad Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
