Mulayam v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a procedural order admitting a criminal appeal and listing it for future consideration. It does not contain substantive legal reasoning or a final disposition of the merits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 11438 of 2025
Mulayam
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ved Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 51
HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Admit.
Summon the record of trial court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mulayam
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/11438/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court