This is a short procedural order listing a defective review application, issuing notice, and clarifying that pendency does not grant interim protection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 160 of 2025
Mohd. Anis
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Deputy Director Of Consolidation District Sitapur Camp At Kheri And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arjun Kumar Kaushal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
(C.M.Application No. 1 of 2025)(Application for condonation of delay)
Heard.
Issue notice, returnable at an early date.
Steps be taken within seven working days.
List after service of notice.
It is made clear that pendency of the present review application, shall not be treated as interim protection to the applicant and it is open for the trial court to proceed in accordance with law.
(Saurabh Lavania,J.)
October 6, 2025
Jyoti/-
Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohd. Anis
Deputy Director Of Consolidation District Sitapur Camp At Kheri
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
