Bansh Raj Singh v. Sri Raj Karan Nayyar, S.S.P. Distt. Ayodhya
Case brief
What is this about?
The court listed the contempt application for the next week. It directed the applicant's counsel to file a supplementary affidavit stating whether the challenged amount was recovered but not refunded.
What the court decided
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 806 of 2025
Applicant :- Bansh Raj Singh Opposite Party :- Sri Raj Karan Nayyar, S.S.P. Distt. Ayodhya Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
- List in the next week as fresh.
- In the meantime, learned counsel for the applicant may file supplementary affidavit stating therein that amount which was mentioned in the impugned order, which was challenged before the writ court, was already recovered but the same has not been refunded.
Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be directed to file a supplementary affidavit regarding the recovery and refund of the challenged amount.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bansh Raj Singh
- respondent
Sri Raj Karan Nayyar
Coram
Rajeev Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CAPL/806/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow Thru. Regional Manager Vs Rekha Pathak and Others
Radhe Shyam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Govt. of U.P. Lko. and 2 Others
Gopi Nath Nishad vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal Executive Director K.M. Sugar Mills Limited Kanpur and 2 Others
Satyeshwari Rajpoot vs Shri Bholendra Pratap Singh District Basic Education Officer Ambedkar Nagar