Applicant sought contempt proceedings for non-compliance with an earlier High Court order quashing his termination from service. The court found prima facie contempt requiring consideration and issued a compliance/show-cause notice to the District Basic Education Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 7172 of 2025
Vinod Kumar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Shri Sanjeev Kumar, District Basic Education Officer
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyam Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
December 10, 2025 vkg
(Dinesh Pathak,J.)
Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod Kumar
Shri Sanjeev Kumar, District Basic Education Officer
Dinesh Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
