Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a writ court order; counsel stated compliance had been made and the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2349 of 2017
Rajendra Bahadur Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| Prof. Akhtar Haseeb V.C Narendra Deo Univ.Of Agriculture And |
..... | Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brajesh Kumar Agrawal |
Singh, Vikas | Kumar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Satyanshu Ojha, |
Manik Sinha |
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of above, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Notice, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
October 27, 2025
Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rajendra Bahadur Singh
Prof. Akhtar Haseeb V.C Narendra Deo Univ.Of Agriculture And
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
