Contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution as neither counsel nor applicant appeared; notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2131 of 2019
Rajesh Kumar Pandey
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Sri Narendra Dev Pandey D.I.O.S. Sultanpur
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anshuman Singh Rathore Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called out in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf to adjourn the case.
In view of the aforesaid, the present case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Notice issued, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
December 4, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rajesh Kumar Pandey
Sri Narendra Dev Pandey D.I.O.S. Sultanpur
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
